Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs YAFFX
RMEBX vs YAFFX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs YAFFX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
AMG Yacktman Focused N
Price$18.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
RMEBX vs YAFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. YAFFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and YAFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. YAFFX (2.52B). YAFFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: YAFFX (1.79) vs RMEBX (1.21). RMEBX was incepted earlier than YAFFX: RMEBX (11 years) vs YAFFX (28 years). YAFFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. YAFFX (5.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than YAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs YAFFX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. YAFFX (-11.34). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. YAFFX (24.74).
| RMEBX | YAFFX | RMEBX / YAFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.25 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.25 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.203 | 1.460 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101B | 2.52B | 4,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | -11.34 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.77 | 0.48 | 3,484% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.02 | 24.74 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.89 | -17.33 | -340% |