Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFAX vs RMFCX
RMFAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFAX vs RMFCX
RMFAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFAX (117B) and RMFCX (117B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMFCX pays higher dividends than RMFAX: RMFCX (1.19) vs RMFAX (0.79). RMFAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RMFAX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFAX (30.00) and RMFCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFAX (250) and RMFCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RMFAX (9.32). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.65 vs. RMFAX (34.55).
| RMFAX | RMFCX | RMFAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | 6.180 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 117B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.19 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 9.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.67 | 32.47 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.55 | 37.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.91 | 93.70 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement