Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs RSEDX
RMFCX vs RSEDX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs RSEDX
RMFCX vs RSEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. RSEDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and RSEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RSEDX (3.75B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than RSEDX: RMFCX (1.15) vs RSEDX (0.83). RMFCX was incepted earlier than RSEDX: RMFCX (24 years) vs RSEDX (20 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RSEDX (0.70). RSEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RSEDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: RSEDX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RSEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.41 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RSEDX (36.41) and RMFCX (35.61) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | RSEDX | RMFCX / RSEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 19.915 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 3.75B | 3,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.83 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 18.41 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 47.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 36.41 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | 91.45 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement