Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs RSEDX
RMFCX vs RSEDX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs RSEDX
RMFCX vs RSEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. RSEDX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and RSEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSEDX (3.54B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than RSEDX: RMFCX (1.16) vs RSEDX (0.86). RMFCX was incepted earlier than RSEDX: RMFCX (24 years) vs RSEDX (20 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RSEDX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RSEDX (27.00). RSEDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: RSEDX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RSEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.68 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. RSEDX (31.46).
| RMFCX | RSEDX | RMFCX / RSEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 15.630 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 3.54B | 3,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.86 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 20.68 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 42.87 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 31.46 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 82.14 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement