Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs RSOOX
RMFCX vs RSOOX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs RSOOX
RMFCX vs RSOOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. RSOOX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and RSOOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSOOX (2.54B). RSOOX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: RSOOX (1.96) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than RSOOX: RMFCX (24 years) vs RSOOX (18 years). RSOOX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RSOOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RSOOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: RSOOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RSOOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.95 vs. RMFCX (7.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. RSOOX (33.27).
| RMFCX | RSOOX | RMFCX / RSOOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.28 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.28 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.325 | 16.802 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.54B | 4,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.96 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 18.95 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 40.70 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 33.27 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | 47.86 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement