Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs RYDAX
RMFCX vs RYDAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs RYDAX
RMFCX vs RYDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. RYDAX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and RYDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RYDAX (22.4M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than RYDAX: RMFCX (1.16) vs RYDAX (0.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than RYDAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs RYDAX (11 years). RYDAX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RYDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYDAX: RMFCX (250) vs RYDAX (2500). RYDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.14 vs. RMFCX (9.26). RYDAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.48 vs. RMFCX (37.48).
| RMFCX | RYDAX | RMFCX / RYDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.61 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.67 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.881 | 9.267 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 22.4M | 526,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.20 | 584% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.26 | 19.14 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 50.35 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.48 | 44.48 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.61 | 146.08 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement