Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs RYDKX
RMFCX vs RYDKX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs RYDKX
RMFCX vs RYDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. RYDKX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and RYDKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RYDKX (21.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than RYDKX: RMFCX (1.16) vs RYDKX (0.22). RMFCX was incepted earlier than RYDKX: RMFCX (24 years) vs RYDKX (11 years). RYDKX (2.42) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RYDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYDKX: RMFCX (250) vs RYDKX (2500). RYDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. RMFCX (8.22). RMFCX (37.01) and RYDKX (35.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | RYDKX | RMFCX / RYDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.36 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.445 | 6.877 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 21.1M | 559,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.22 | 535% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 15.02 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 39.96 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.01 | 35.30 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.39 | 124.08 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement