Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs RYDKX
RMFCX vs RYDKX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs RYDKX
RMFCX vs RYDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. RYDKX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and RYDKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RYDKX (24.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than RYDKX: RMFCX (1.15) vs RYDKX (0.22). RMFCX was incepted earlier than RYDKX: RMFCX (24 years) vs RYDKX (11 years). RYDKX (2.42) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RYDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYDKX: RMFCX (250) vs RYDKX (2500). RYDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.90 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RYDKX return over 5 years is better than : 38.75 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| RMFCX | RYDKX | RMFCX / RYDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.36 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.454 | 10.296 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 24.5M | 481,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.22 | 532% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 17.90 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.82 | 49.74 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 38.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | 128.99 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers