Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$18.66
Change+$0.13 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.67M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SLVCX (18.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.26) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. SLVCX (-9.12). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.16 vs. SLVCX (4.28).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.237 | 12.988 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 18.7M | 582,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | -9.12 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.25 | -3.09 | -916% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.16 | 4.28 | 1,266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.05 | -1.23 | -7,263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement