Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.96
Change-$0.50 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.77B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$18.24
Change-$0.18 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.63M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. SLVCX (18.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.26) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. SLVCX (-10.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. SLVCX (7.87).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 11.220 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108B | 18.6M | 580,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | -10.24 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.63 | -4.35 | -589% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.18 | 7.87 | 714% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.53 | -8.66 | -883% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement