Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.89
Change-$0.16 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.45B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$17.00
Change-$0.10 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.73M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Feb 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SLVCX (19.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.69) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (26 years). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.45 vs. SLVCX (-12.28). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.68 vs. SLVCX (-9.19).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.213 | 3.659 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 19.7M | 532,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.45 | -12.28 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.12 | -12.01 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.68 | -9.19 | -486% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.31 | -11.50 | -585% |