Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$17.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.45M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SLVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. SLVCX (17.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. SLVCX (-13.35). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. SLVCX (-9.05).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.617 | 9.634 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 17.5M | 628,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.59 | -13.35 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.75 | -5.96 | -465% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.85 | -9.05 | -573% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.46 | -2.44 | -3,459% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement