Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$17.06
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.17M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. SLVCX (18.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.37) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (26 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. SLVCX (-14.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. SLVCX (9.96).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.270 | 3.659 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101B | 18.2M | 554,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | -14.27 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | -3.30 | -524% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.16 | 9.96 | 564% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.33 | -17.60 | -343% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...