Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$15.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.73M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. SLVCX (16.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (26 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. SLVCX (-19.26). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. SLVCX (8.03).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.342 | -5.671 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.5B | 16.7M | 577,844% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | -19.26 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.79 | -21.03 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.78 | 8.03 | 607% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.90 | -24.46 | -216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...