Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVYX
RMFCX vs SLVYX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVYX
RMFCX vs SLVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVYX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SLVYX (15.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVYX: RMFCX (1.16) vs SLVYX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVYX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SLVYX (20 years). SLVYX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLVYX: RMFCX (250) vs SLVYX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. SLVYX (-7.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. SLVYX (-17.44).
| RMFCX | SLVYX | RMFCX / SLVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 3.502 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 15.2M | 776,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | -7.05 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 1.20 | 2,912% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -17.44 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 21.74 | 419% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement