Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SSHFX
RMFCX vs SSHFX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SSHFX
RMFCX vs SSHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SSHFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SSHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SSHFX (1.01B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SSHFX: RMFCX (1.15) vs SSHFX (0.70). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SSHFX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SSHFX (41 years). SSHFX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SSHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSHFX: RMFCX (250) vs SSHFX (10000). SSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. RMFCX (6.97). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.53 vs. SSHFX (-10.18).
| RMFCX | SSHFX | RMFCX / SSHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.035 | 8.960 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 1.01B | 11,706% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.70 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 7.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.31 | 20.56 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.53 | -10.18 | -349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.67 | 8.20 | 1,154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers