Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SSHFX
RMFCX vs SSHFX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SSHFX
RMFCX vs SSHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SSHFX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SSHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SSHFX (977M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SSHFX: RMFCX (1.16) vs SSHFX (0.72). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SSHFX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SSHFX (41 years). SSHFX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SSHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSHFX: RMFCX (250) vs SSHFX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. SSHFX (5.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. SSHFX (-11.03).
| RMFCX | SSHFX | RMFCX / SSHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.325 | 5.491 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 977M | 12,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.72 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 5.80 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 12.20 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | -11.03 | -336% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | 5.26 | 1,730% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement