Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SSHVX
RMFCX vs SSHVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SSHVX
RMFCX vs SSHVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SSHVX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SSHVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SSHVX (1B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SSHVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs SSHVX (0.78). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SSHVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SSHVX (13 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SSHVX (0.86). SSHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSHVX: RMFCX (250) vs SSHVX (1000000). SSHVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. RMFCX (7.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.12 vs. SSHVX (-8.75).
| RMFCX | SSHVX | RMFCX / SSHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.75 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.86 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.650 | 9.209 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 1B | 11,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.78 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.47 | 8.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.69 | 19.91 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.12 | -8.75 | -401% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.44 | 9.00 | 1,016% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers