Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SSHVX
RMFCX vs SSHVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SSHVX
RMFCX vs SSHVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SSHVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SSHVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SSHVX (988M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SSHVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs SSHVX (0.78). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SSHVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SSHVX (13 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SSHVX (0.86). SSHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSHVX: RMFCX (250) vs SSHVX (1000000). SSHVX (9.04) and RMFCX (8.88) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. SSHVX (-8.75).
| RMFCX | SSHVX | RMFCX / SSHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.75 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.86 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 6.625 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 988M | 11,943% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.78 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 9.04 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 17.13 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -8.75 | -425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 9.95 | 915% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers