Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.95
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.16
Change+$0.09 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.18M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a StrongBuy and STVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. STVZX (557M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.50) vs RMFCX (1.34). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. STVZX (-13.25). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. STVZX (12.37).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.814 | -0.297 | -947% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102B | 557M | 18,312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | -13.25 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.52 | -13.55 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.10 | 12.37 | 615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.70 | -30.82 | -213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers