Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.09B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.86
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets418.11M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. STVZX (418M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. STVZX (-11.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. STVZX (-6.88).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.613 | 6.535 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 418M | 26,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.41 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | -11.94 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.44 | 13.69 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.04 | -6.88 | -888% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.77 | -25.68 | -346% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers