Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.73
Change+$0.06 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets621.34M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. STVZX (621M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.47) vs RMFCX (1.27). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. STVZX (-7.29). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. STVZX (-1.62).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.347 | 5.644 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 621M | 17,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.47 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.38 | -7.29 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.87 | 6.11 | 506% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.49 | -1.62 | -3,731% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.82 | -25.90 | -316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement