Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.01
Change+$0.55 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$9.42
Change+$0.10 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.84M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. STVZX (521M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.50) vs RMFCX (1.34). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. STVZX (-17.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.63 vs. STVZX (-7.80).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.599 | -7.723 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.2B | 521M | 18,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | -17.68 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.19 | -16.86 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.63 | -7.80 | -649% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.64 | -37.36 | -138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...