Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.73
Change+$0.10 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets613.41M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. STVZX (613M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.24). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. STVZX (-8.37). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. STVZX (-5.66).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.421 | 5.842 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 613M | 17,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.42 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | -8.37 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 7.53 | 427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.41 | -5.66 | -997% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.12 | -20.98 | -434% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers