Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.76
Change+$0.05 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets605.57M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and STVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. STVZX (606M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.24). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. STVZX (-12.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.02 vs. STVZX (-4.14).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.245 | 6.040 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 606M | 18,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.42 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | -12.06 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.85 | 18.41 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.02 | -4.14 | -1,475% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | -20.37 | -481% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers