Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.58
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.38M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and STVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. STVZX (247M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.21). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. STVZX (-14.87). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. STVZX (-14.12).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.617 | 5.149 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 247M | 44,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.59 | -14.87 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.75 | 3.07 | 905% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.85 | -14.12 | -367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.46 | -27.31 | -309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers