Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.59M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. STVZX (532M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.51) vs RMFCX (1.31). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. STVZX (-12.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. STVZX (-11.67).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.423 | -0.099 | -5,477% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 532M | 19,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.51 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | -12.41 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.47 | -8.27 | -223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.95 | -11.67 | -437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.73 | -31.10 | -224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement