Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. STVZX (275M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.90) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (24 years) vs STVZX (12 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 157.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. STVZX (7.73). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. STVZX (-22.00).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 13.701 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 275M | 42,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.90 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 7.73 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 11.83 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -22.00 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | -19.09 | -477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement