Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVAX
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.44
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val A
Price$12.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.22M
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVAX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVAX (251M). SUVAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVAX (2.84) vs RMFCX (1.26). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVAX (24 years). SUVAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVAX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. SUVAX (-3.85). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.88 vs. SUVAX (39.67).
| RMFCX | SUVAX | RMFCX / SUVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.11 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.403 | 10.017 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 251M | 43,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.84 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | -3.85 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.34 | 5.23 | 580% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.88 | 39.67 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | 13.82 | 695% |