Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVAX
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.88
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.58B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val A
Price$12.97
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.25M
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVAX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. SUVAX (248M). SUVAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVAX (2.70) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVAX (25 years). SUVAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVAX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. SUVAX (-3.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.04 vs. SUVAX (40.89).
| RMFCX | SUVAX | RMFCX / SUVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.11 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.373 | 11.644 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113B | 248M | 45,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.70 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | -3.83 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.70 | 17.57 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.04 | 40.89 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.10 | 10.40 | 896% |