Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVAX
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVAX
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. SUVAX (257M). RMFCX (1.19) and SUVAX (1.17) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SUVAX (25 years). SUVAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVAX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVAX (1000). SUVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. SUVAX (-3.27).
| RMFCX | SUVAX | RMFCX / SUVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.11 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.33 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.510 | 14.164 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 257M | 44,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.17 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 13.42 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 22.40 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.04 | -3.27 | -1,040% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.67 | 25.54 | 363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers