Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVAX
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVAX
RMFCX vs SUVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SUVAX (275M). RMFCX (1.15) and SUVAX (1.10) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SUVAX (25 years). SUVAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVAX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVAX (1000). SUVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.52 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. SUVAX (9.36).
| RMFCX | SUVAX | RMFCX / SUVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.11 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.33 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.454 | 24.915 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 275M | 42,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.10 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 17.52 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.82 | 30.53 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 9.36 | 392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | 32.23 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers