Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.41
Change+$0.10 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.25M
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SUVCX (239M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVCX (2.36) vs RMFCX (1.31). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. SUVCX (-7.87). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. SUVCX (13.54).
| RMFCX | SUVCX | RMFCX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.13 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.46 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.919 | 1.877 | 315% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 239M | 43,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 2.36 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.01 | -7.87 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.82 | -14.97 | -119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.66 | 13.54 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.47 | -16.58 | -425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement