Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.58
Change+$0.11 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.98M
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. SUVCX (242M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVCX (2.36) vs RMFCX (1.31). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. SUVCX (-5.70). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. SUVCX (34.94).
| RMFCX | SUVCX | RMFCX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.13 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.46 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.403 | 3.459 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 242M | 43,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 2.36 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.64 | -5.70 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.42 | -5.12 | -516% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.87 | 34.94 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | -14.78 | -515% |