Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$11.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.22M
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVCX (251M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVCX (2.30) vs RMFCX (1.26). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. SUVCX (-6.17). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. SUVCX (28.18).
| RMFCX | SUVCX | RMFCX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.13 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.46 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.642 | 9.190 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 251M | 43,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | -6.17 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.24 | -1.94 | -1,504% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.21 | 28.18 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.22 | -4.93 | -1,851% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement