Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.81
Change-$0.24 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.07B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.20
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.23M
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SUVCX (241M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVCX (2.45) vs RMFCX (1.37). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. SUVCX (-9.50). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.35 vs. SUVCX (43.78).
| RMFCX | SUVCX | RMFCX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.13 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.46 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.998 | 1.383 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 241M | 42,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 2.45 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | -9.50 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.52 | -11.33 | -163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.35 | 43.78 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.94 | -21.43 | -289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...