Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SUVCX (264M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SUVCX: RMFCX (1.16) vs SUVCX (0.55). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). SUVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. SUVCX (-5.41).
| RMFCX | SUVCX | RMFCX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.13 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.52 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 18.338 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 264M | 44,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.55 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 10.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 12.93 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -5.41 | -688% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 7.49 | 1,217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement