Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVQX
RMFCX vs SUVQX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVQX
RMFCX vs SUVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVQX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SUVQX (275M). SUVQX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVQX (1.28) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVQX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SUVQX (9 years). SUVQX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). SUVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SUVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. SUVQX (12.86).
| RMFCX | SUVQX | RMFCX / SUVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.454 | 25.122 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 275M | 42,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.28 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 18.67 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.82 | 33.50 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 12.86 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers