Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.47
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$12.95
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.31M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVZX (245M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (3.01) vs RMFCX (1.26). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. SUVZX (-2.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. SUVZX (38.21).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.615 | 6.143 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 245M | 44,490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 3.01 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.26 | -2.00 | -462% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.20 | -3.24 | -685% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.85 | 38.21 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.57 | 5.56 | 1,395% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement