Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$13.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.78M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. SUVZX (249M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (2.86) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (25 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. SUVZX (-2.16). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. SUVZX (44.51).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.983 | 11.957 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113B | 249M | 45,382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.86 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -2.16 | -363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.87 | 18.87 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.89 | 44.51 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.24 | 15.61 | 604% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement