Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.14
Change-$1.81 (-3.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$11.77
Change-$0.58 (-4.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.2M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a StrongBuy and SUVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SUVZX (242M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (3.15) vs RMFCX (1.34). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. SUVZX (-7.90). SUVZX (78.58) and RMFCX (76.10) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.814 | 1.147 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 242M | 42,562% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 3.15 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.77 | -7.90 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | -10.78 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.10 | 78.58 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.62 | -3.50 | -1,845% |