Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.44
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.45B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$13.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.12M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVZX (252M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (2.90) vs RMFCX (1.24). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. SUVZX (-3.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.88 vs. SUVZX (43.27).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.403 | 10.238 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 252M | 43,254% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | -3.06 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.34 | 6.95 | 436% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.88 | 43.27 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | 19.17 | 501% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement