Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.45
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.64B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$12.93
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.71M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVZX (248M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (3.00) vs RMFCX (1.27). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. SUVZX (-6.26). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. SUVZX (43.88).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.578 | 5.405 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 248M | 43,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 3.00 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.23 | -6.26 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 5.70 | 557% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.17 | 43.88 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.07 | 3.60 | 2,111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement