Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$12.64
Change+$0.13 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.25M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SUVZX (239M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (3.09) vs RMFCX (1.31). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. SUVZX (-4.35). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. SUVZX (26.95).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.919 | 2.457 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 239M | 43,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 3.09 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.01 | -4.35 | -207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.82 | -8.42 | -212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.66 | 26.95 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.47 | 1.19 | 5,909% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement