Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.85B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$12.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.7M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SUVZX (260M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SUVZX: RMFCX (1.69) vs SUVZX (1.14). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (24 years). SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. SUVZX (4.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. SUVZX (5.22).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.162 | 3.440 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 260M | 39,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.14 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | 4.55 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.60 | -10.30 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.82 | 5.22 | 725% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.18 | 0.63 | 10,293% |