Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$13.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.4M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. SUVZX (244M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (2.85) vs RMFCX (1.21). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (25 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. SUVZX (-4.40). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. SUVZX (31.18).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.783 | 12.285 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 244M | 45,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.85 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | -4.40 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 5.82 | 480% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.67 | 31.18 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.73 | 13.33 | 636% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers