Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. SUVZX (257M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SUVZX (25 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SUVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.59 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. SUVZX (-0.03).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.845 | 14.332 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 257M | 44,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 14.59 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.65 | 25.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | -0.03 | -101,721% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.46 | 32.45 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers