Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SUVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SUVZX (262M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SUVZX (25 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SUVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.85 vs. RMFCX (9.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. SUVZX (6.47).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.368 | 17.247 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 262M | 44,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 15.85 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.91 | 27.38 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 6.47 | 551% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.09 | 40.84 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers