Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SVAAX
RMFCX vs SVAAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SVAAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.09
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div A
Price$6.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.77B
RMFCX vs SVAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SVAAX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SVAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SVAAX (8.77B). SVAAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SVAAX (2.99) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SVAAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SVAAX (21 years). SVAAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SVAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVAAX: RMFCX (250) vs SVAAX (1500). SVAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.59 vs. RMFCX (7.91). SVAAX return over 5 years is better than : 70.02 vs. RMFCX (63.49).
| RMFCX | SVAAX | RMFCX / SVAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.06 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.17 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.761 | 13.510 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 8.77B | 1,277% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.99 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.91 | 8.59 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.55 | 29.00 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.49 | 70.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.36 | 50.16 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers