Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SVAAX
RMFCX vs SVAAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SVAAX
RMFCX vs SVAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SVAAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SVAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SVAAX (9.72B). SVAAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SVAAX (3.07) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SVAAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SVAAX (21 years). SVAAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SVAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVAAX: RMFCX (250) vs SVAAX (1500). SVAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. RMFCX (8.88). SVAAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.03 vs. RMFCX (37.23).
| RMFCX | SVAAX | RMFCX / SVAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.06 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 12.247 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 9.72B | 1,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.07 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 15.73 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 45.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 50.03 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 47.11 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement