Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SVALX
RMFCX vs SVALX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SVALX
RMFCX vs SVALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SVALX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SVALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SVALX (9.72B). SVALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SVALX (3.29) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SVALX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SVALX (10 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SVALX (0.84). SVALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). SVALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SVALX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SVALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. RMFCX (8.88). SVALX return over 5 years is better than : 52.07 vs. RMFCX (37.23).
| RMFCX | SVALX | RMFCX / SVALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.84 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 12.283 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 9.72B | 1,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.29 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 16.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 46.34 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 52.07 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 56.23 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement