Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SVALX
RMFCX vs SVALX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SVALX
RMFCX vs SVALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SVALX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SVALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SVALX (9.8B). SVALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SVALX (3.07) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SVALX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SVALX (10 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SVALX (0.84). SVALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). SVALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SVALX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SVALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.61 vs. RMFCX (4.75). SVALX return over 5 years is better than : 54.55 vs. RMFCX (35.61).
| RMFCX | SVALX | RMFCX / SVALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.84 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 14.048 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 9.8B | 1,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 3.07 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 13.61 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 51.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 54.55 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | 66.17 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement