Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SVALX
RMFCX vs SVALX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SVALX
RMFCX vs SVALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SVALX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SVALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SVALX (9.99B). SVALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SVALX (3.23) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SVALX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SVALX (10 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SVALX (0.84). SVALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). SVALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SVALX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SVALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.81 vs. RMFCX (9.09). SVALX return over 5 years is better than : 56.43 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| RMFCX | SVALX | RMFCX / SVALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.84 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.496 | 15.531 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 9.99B | 1,181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 3.23 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 20.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.16 | 49.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 56.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.36 | 62.61 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers