Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SWDSX
RMFCX vs SWDSX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SWDSX
RMFCX vs SWDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SWDSX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SWDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SWDSX (678M). SWDSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SWDSX (1.51) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SWDSX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SWDSX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and SWDSX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SWDSX (8.00). SWDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SWDSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SWDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.86 vs. RMFCX (9.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.68 vs. SWDSX (29.21).
| RMFCX | SWDSX | RMFCX / SWDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.616 | 14.150 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 678M | 17,404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.51 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.80 | 17.86 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.60 | 57.83 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.68 | 29.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.87 | 53.92 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers