Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TCLCX
RMFCX vs TCLCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TCLCX
RMFCX vs TCLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TCLCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TCLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TCLCX (6.44B). TCLCX (1.19) and RMFCX (1.15) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TCLCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TCLCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TCLCX (0.74). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TCLCX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCLCX: RMFCX (250) vs TCLCX (2500). TCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.36 vs. RMFCX (6.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.44 vs. TCLCX (30.87).
| RMFCX | TCLCX | RMFCX / TCLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.74 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.74 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.402 | 18.280 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.44B | 1,817% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 16.36 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.52 | 42.41 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.44 | 30.87 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.54 | 71.64 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement