Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TGDVX
RMFCX vs TGDVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TGDVX
RMFCX vs TGDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TGDVX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TGDVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TGDVX (576M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TGDVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs TGDVX (1.03). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TGDVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TGDVX (29 years). TGDVX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). TGDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.97 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGDVX: RMFCX (250) vs TGDVX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. TGDVX (6.02). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.14 vs. TGDVX (22.82).
| RMFCX | TGDVX | RMFCX / TGDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.85 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.02 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.992 | 17.579 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 576M | 20,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.03 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 6.02 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.75 | 29.98 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.14 | 22.82 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.84 | -12.06 | -786% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement