Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TGDVX
RMFCX vs TGDVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TGDVX
RMFCX vs TGDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TGDVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TGDVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TGDVX (556M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TGDVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs TGDVX (1.05). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TGDVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TGDVX (28 years). TGDVX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). TGDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.97 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGDVX: RMFCX (250) vs TGDVX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. TGDVX (4.96). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. TGDVX (20.33).
| RMFCX | TGDVX | RMFCX / TGDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.85 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.02 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.368 | 11.359 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 556M | 21,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.05 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 4.96 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.91 | 30.28 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 20.33 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.09 | -9.68 | -992% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement