Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TGDVX
RMFCX vs TGDVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TGDVX
RMFCX vs TGDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TGDVX commentary
Jul 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TGDVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TGDVX (553M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TGDVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs TGDVX (1.06). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TGDVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TGDVX (29 years). TGDVX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). TGDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.97 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGDVX: RMFCX (250) vs TGDVX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. TGDVX (0.59). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.35 vs. TGDVX (22.63).
| RMFCX | TGDVX | RMFCX / TGDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.85 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.02 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.778 | 12.373 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 553M | 21,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.06 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 0.59 | 1,414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.69 | 23.68 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.35 | 22.63 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.58 | -14.34 | -632% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement