Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCAX
RMFCX vs TQCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCAX
RMFCX vs TQCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TQCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCAX (2.52B). TQCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TQCAX (1.25) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCAX (28 years). TQCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCAX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCAX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCAX (2500). TQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.39 vs. RMFCX (9.14). TQCAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.76 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| RMFCX | TQCAX | RMFCX / TQCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.01 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.454 | 15.501 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.52B | 4,692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.25 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 16.39 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.82 | 45.14 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 38.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | 63.47 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers