Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCAX
RMFCX vs TQCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCAX
RMFCX vs TQCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCAX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TQCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCAX (2.46B). TQCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TQCAX (1.27) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCAX (28 years). TQCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCAX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCAX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCAX (2500). TQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. RMFCX (7.69). RMFCX (37.08) and TQCAX (36.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TQCAX | RMFCX / TQCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.01 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.325 | 12.072 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.46B | 4,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 13.22 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 34.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 36.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | 57.98 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers