Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCAX
RMFCX vs TQCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCAX
RMFCX vs TQCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TQCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQCAX (2.48B). TQCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TQCAX (1.27) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCAX (28 years). TQCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCAX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCAX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCAX (2500). TQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. RMFCX (8.78). RMFCX (37.32) and TQCAX (35.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TQCAX | RMFCX / TQCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.01 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.189 | 12.123 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.48B | 4,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | 13.33 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 40.38 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.32 | 35.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.35 | 61.79 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement