Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCCX
RMFCX vs TQCCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCCX
RMFCX vs TQCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TQCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQCCX (2.47B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TQCCX: RMFCX (1.19) vs TQCCX (0.69). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCCX (28 years). TQCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCCX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCCX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCCX (2500). TQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.34 vs. RMFCX (9.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.71 vs. TQCCX (28.13).
| RMFCX | TQCCX | RMFCX / TQCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.78 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.953 | 10.747 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.47B | 4,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.69 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 16.34 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 35.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.71 | 28.13 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.50 | 56.82 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers