Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCCX
RMFCX vs TQCCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCCX
RMFCX vs TQCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TQCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCCX (2.47B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TQCCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs TQCCX (0.60). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCCX (28 years). TQCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCCX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCCX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCCX (2500). TQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. TQCCX (32.48).
| RMFCX | TQCCX | RMFCX / TQCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.78 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.496 | 12.471 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.47B | 4,770% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.60 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 15.05 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.16 | 32.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 32.48 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.36 | 53.77 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers