Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCRX
RMFCX vs TQCRX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCRX
RMFCX vs TQCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCRX (2.48B). TQCRX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TQCRX (1.58) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCRX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCRX (5 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TQCRX (0.78). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCRX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCRX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCRX (50000). TQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. RMFCX (8.88).
| RMFCX | TQCRX | RMFCX / TQCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.64 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.78 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 12.607 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.48B | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.58 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 14.25 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 39.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement