Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCYX
RMFCX vs TQCYX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCYX
RMFCX vs TQCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCYX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TQCYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TQCYX (2.45B). TQCYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TQCYX (1.53) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCYX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCYX (13 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TQCYX (0.76). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCYX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCYX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCYX (2500). TQCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.81 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX (34.04) and TQCYX (33.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TQCYX | RMFCX / TQCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.76 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.76 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.510 | 10.202 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 2.45B | 4,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 19.81 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 41.05 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.04 | 33.25 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.67 | 67.89 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers