Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TQCYX
RMFCX vs TQCYX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TQCYX
RMFCX vs TQCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TQCYX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TQCYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCYX (2.48B). TQCYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TQCYX (1.49) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TQCYX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TQCYX (13 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TQCYX (0.76). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCYX (12.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCYX: RMFCX (250) vs TQCYX (2500). TQCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. RMFCX (8.88). TQCYX (37.96) and RMFCX (37.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TQCYX | RMFCX / TQCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.76 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.76 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 12.600 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.48B | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 14.13 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 38.59 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 37.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 62.57 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement