Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRCVX
RMFCX vs TRCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRCVX
RMFCX vs TRCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRCVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRCVX (13.5B). TRCVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRCVX (1.37) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRCVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRCVX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRCVX (0.30). TRCVX (31.00) and RMFCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. TRCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRCVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.85 vs. RMFCX (8.88). TRCVX return over 5 years is better than : 49.56 vs. RMFCX (37.23).
| RMFCX | TRCVX | RMFCX / TRCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 18.115 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 13.5B | 874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.37 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 22.85 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 51.88 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 49.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 117.45 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement