Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRCVX
RMFCX vs TRCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRCVX
RMFCX vs TRCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRCVX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TRCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TRCVX (12.9B). TRCVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRCVX (1.40) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRCVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRCVX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRCVX (0.30). TRCVX (31.00) and RMFCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. TRCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRCVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.90 vs. RMFCX (10.10). TRCVX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. RMFCX (33.85).
| RMFCX | TRCVX | RMFCX / TRCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.845 | 13.264 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 12.9B | 891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.40 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 22.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.65 | 52.40 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | 41.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.46 | 116.01 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement