Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
Nuveen Large Cap Value Retire
Price$24.58
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. TRLCX (6.23B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TRLCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs TRLCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TRLCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLCX (0.66). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRLCX (19.00). TRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRLCX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.09 vs. RMFCX (7.10). RMFCX (60.18) and TRLCX (58.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TRLCX | RMFCX / TRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.931 | 11.419 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 6.23B | 1,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 8.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.09 | 32.88 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.18 | 58.89 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.26 | 58.20 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement