Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLCX (6.46B). TRLCX (1.17) and RMFCX (1.16) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLCX (0.65). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLCX (17.00). TRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRLCX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. TRLCX (31.28).
| RMFCX | TRLCX | RMFCX / TRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 15.466 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.17 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 16.44 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 41.02 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 31.28 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 73.79 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement