Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRLCX (6.38B). RMFCX (1.15) and TRLCX (1.12) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLCX (0.65). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLCX (17.00). TRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRLCX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.63 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. TRLCX (32.37).
| RMFCX | TRLCX | RMFCX / TRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 17.488 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.38B | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 14.63 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 42.86 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 32.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | 77.05 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement