Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLCX
RMFCX vs TRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLCX (6.56B). RMFCX (1.15) and TRLCX (1.13) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLCX (0.65). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLCX (17.00). TRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRLCX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.62 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. TRLCX (33.30).
| RMFCX | TRLCX | RMFCX / TRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.496 | 18.205 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.56B | 1,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.13 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 20.62 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.16 | 40.08 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 33.30 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.36 | 80.12 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement