Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLHX
RMFCX vs TRLHX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLHX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
Nuveen Large Cap Value I
Price$24.12
Change+$0.16 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
RMFCX vs TRLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLHX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. TRLHX (6.59B). TRLHX (1.27) and RMFCX (1.27) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLHX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TRLHX (10 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLHX (0.50). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRLHX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLHX: RMFCX (250) vs TRLHX (100000). TRLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.13 vs. RMFCX (11.47). TRLHX return over 5 years is better than : 66.53 vs. RMFCX (61.83).
| RMFCX | TRLHX | RMFCX / TRLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.50 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.50 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.596 | 9.338 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 6.59B | 1,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.27 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 12.13 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 32.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.83 | 66.53 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement