Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLHX
RMFCX vs TRLHX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLHX
RMFCX vs TRLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TRLHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRLHX (6.43B). TRLHX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLHX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLHX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLHX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLHX (0.43). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLHX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLHX: RMFCX (250) vs TRLHX (100000). TRLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.49 vs. RMFCX (9.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. TRLHX (32.75).
| RMFCX | TRLHX | RMFCX / TRLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.43 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.43 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.368 | 13.728 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.43B | 1,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 19.49 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.91 | 43.91 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 32.75 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.09 | 84.93 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement