Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLHX
RMFCX vs TRLHX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLHX
RMFCX vs TRLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLHX (6.46B). TRLHX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLHX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLHX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLHX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLHX (0.43). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLHX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLHX: RMFCX (250) vs TRLHX (100000). TRLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.76 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. TRLHX (32.44).
| RMFCX | TRLHX | RMFCX / TRLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.43 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.43 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 15.617 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.41 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 16.76 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 41.91 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 32.44 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 76.02 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement