Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLIX
RMFCX vs TRLIX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLIX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
Nuveen Large Cap Value R6
Price$24.44
Change-$0.10 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
RMFCX vs TRLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLIX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. TRLIX (6.22B). TRLIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLIX (1.32) vs RMFCX (1.24). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLIX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TRLIX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLIX (0.41). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRLIX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLIX: RMFCX (250) vs TRLIX (1000000). TRLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. RMFCX (7.71). TRLIX (57.45) and RMFCX (56.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TRLIX | RMFCX / TRLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.41 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.41 | 222% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.421 | 11.141 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 6.22B | 1,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | 9.28 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 32.59 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.41 | 57.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.12 | 57.91 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement