Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLIX
RMFCX vs TRLIX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLIX
RMFCX vs TRLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TRLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLIX (6.42B). TRLIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLIX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLIX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLIX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLIX (0.40). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLIX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLIX: RMFCX (250) vs TRLIX (1000000). TRLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.36 vs. RMFCX (7.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. TRLIX (32.50).
| RMFCX | TRLIX | RMFCX / TRLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.40 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.40 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.325 | 15.562 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.42B | 1,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.41 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 16.36 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 38.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 32.50 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | 75.62 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement