Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLIX
RMFCX vs TRLIX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLIX
RMFCX vs TRLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLIX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TRLIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRLIX (6.38B). TRLIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLIX (1.35) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLIX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLIX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLIX (0.40). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLIX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLIX: RMFCX (250) vs TRLIX (1000000). TRLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. RMFCX (4.16). RMFCX (36.35) and TRLIX (34.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TRLIX | RMFCX / TRLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.40 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.40 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.188 | 17.240 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.38B | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.35 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 14.39 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.64 | 46.64 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 34.91 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.05 | 76.74 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement