Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLWX
RMFCX vs TRLWX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLWX
RMFCX vs TRLWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLWX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TRLWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRLWX (6.43B). TRLWX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLWX (1.79) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLWX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLWX (8 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLWX (0.40). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLWX (17.00). TRLWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRLWX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRLWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.81 vs. RMFCX (9.24). RMFCX (35.66) and TRLWX (34.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TRLWX | RMFCX / TRLWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.40 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.368 | 14.603 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.43B | 1,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.79 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 19.81 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.91 | 46.71 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 34.80 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement