Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRLWX
RMFCX vs TRLWX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRLWX
RMFCX vs TRLWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRLWX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRLWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLWX (6.46B). TRLWX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRLWX (1.74) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRLWX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRLWX (8 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRLWX (0.40). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLWX (17.00). TRLWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRLWX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRLWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. TRLWX (34.76).
| RMFCX | TRLWX | RMFCX / TRLWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.40 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 15.820 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.74 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 17.20 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 43.83 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 34.76 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement