Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRVLX
RMFCX vs TRVLX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRVLX
RMFCX vs TRVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRVLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRVLX (34.3B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TRVLX: RMFCX (1.16) vs TRVLX (0.80). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRVLX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRVLX (32 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRVLX (0.72). TRVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.50 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRVLX: RMFCX (250) vs TRVLX (2500). TRVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.34 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. TRVLX (19.59).
| RMFCX | TRVLX | RMFCX / TRVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 16.200 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 34.3B | 344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.80 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 17.34 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 42.93 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 19.59 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 87.52 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers