Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRZAX
RMFCX vs TRZAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRZAX
RMFCX vs TRZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRZAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRZAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRZAX (34.9B). TRZAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRZAX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRZAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRZAX (6 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRZAX (0.56). TRZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.50 vs. RMFCX (30.00). TRZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRZAX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.69 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. TRZAX (23.66).
| RMFCX | TRZAX | RMFCX / TRZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 20.468 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 34.9B | 335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.31 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 18.69 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 49.64 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 23.66 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement