Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRZQX
RMFCX vs TRZQX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRZQX
RMFCX vs TRZQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TRZQX (17.4B). TRZQX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: TRZQX (1.99) vs RMFCX (1.19). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRZQX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TRZQX (5 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRZQX (0.54). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRZQX (18.20). TRZQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRZQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRZQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.83 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. TRZQX (28.61).
| RMFCX | TRZQX | RMFCX / TRZQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.54 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.510 | 11.691 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 17.4B | 661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.99 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 22.83 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 43.73 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.04 | 28.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers