Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TVLAX
RMFCX vs TVLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TVLAX
RMFCX vs TVLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TVLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TVLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TVLAX (624M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TVLAX: RMFCX (1.16) vs TVLAX (0.86). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TVLAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs TVLAX (23 years). TVLAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). TVLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TVLAX: RMFCX (250) vs TVLAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. TVLAX (3.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. TVLAX (17.24).
| RMFCX | TVLAX | RMFCX / TVLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.08 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.11 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 9.950 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 624M | 18,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.86 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 3.54 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 25.87 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 17.24 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 58.02 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement