Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs VWNAX
RMFCX vs VWNAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs VWNAX
RMFCX vs VWNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. VWNAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and VWNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. VWNAX (68.6B). VWNAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: VWNAX (1.35) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than VWNAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs VWNAX (25 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than VWNAX (0.24). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. VWNAX (22.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWNAX: RMFCX (250) vs VWNAX (50000). VWNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. VWNAX (12.67).
| RMFCX | VWNAX | RMFCX / VWNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.24 | 379% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.24 | 379% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 11.835 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 68.6B | 171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.35 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 6.33 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 27.05 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 12.67 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | 49.66 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement