Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WHGLX
RMFCX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WHGLX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
Westwood Quality Value Fund Inst
Price$13.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.24M
RMFCX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WHGLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and WHGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. WHGLX (179M). WHGLX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: WHGLX (1.30) vs RMFCX (1.21). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WHGLX (19 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WHGLX (0.69). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: RMFCX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. WHGLX (-6.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. WHGLX (13.76).
| RMFCX | WHGLX | RMFCX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.69 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.783 | 2.745 | 466% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 179M | 61,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | -6.04 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 11.79 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.67 | 13.76 | 383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.73 | 31.50 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers