RMFCX
Price
$64.10
Change
-$0.24 (-0.37%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
117.86B
WHGLX
Price
$13.00
Change
-$0.08 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
77.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMFCX vs WHGLX

RMFCX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 58.97B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 77.23M to 117.86B. RMFCX holds the highest valuation in this group at 117.86B. The lowest valued company is WHGLX at 77.23M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 8%. WHGLX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while RMFCX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
RMFCX vs. WHGLX commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and WHGLX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WHGLX (77.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WHGLX: RMFCX (1.15) vs WHGLX (1.02). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: RMFCX (24 years) vs WHGLX (20 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WHGLX (0.71). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: RMFCX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.51 vs. WHGLX (-6.74). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. WHGLX (-6.56).
RMFCXWHGLXRMFCX / WHGLX
Total Expense Ratio0.910.63144%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.910.71128%
Fund Existence24 years20 years-
Gain YTD9.58211.69982%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment2501000000%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets118B77.2M152,850%
Annual Yield % from dividends1.151.02113%
Returns for 1 year7.51-6.74-111%
Returns for 3 years36.806.25588%
Returns for 5 years34.46-6.56-526%
Returns for 10 years90.3430.90292%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCEIX20.80N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Emerging Markets I
BAUAX31.30N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fdmtl Val Adv
MXINX18.05N/A
N/A
Empower International Index Inv
SBHCX14.48N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
RGBFX43.27-0.08
-0.18%
American Funds Global Balanced R-5