Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WHGQX
RMFCX vs WHGQX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WHGQX
RMFCX vs WHGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WHGQX (76.2M). RMFCX (1.16) and WHGQX (1.12) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than WHGQX: RMFCX (24 years) vs WHGQX (4 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WHGQX (0.63). WHGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGQX: RMFCX (250) vs WHGQX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. WHGQX (-7.44).
| RMFCX | WHGQX | RMFCX / WHGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.55 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.63 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 8.584 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 76.2M | 154,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | -7.44 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 2.23 | 1,564% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement