Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WHGQX
RMFCX vs WHGQX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WHGQX
RMFCX vs WHGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WHGQX (74.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WHGQX: RMFCX (1.19) vs WHGQX (1.12). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WHGQX: RMFCX (24 years) vs WHGQX (4 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WHGQX (0.63). WHGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGQX: RMFCX (250) vs WHGQX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. WHGQX (-7.17).
| RMFCX | WHGQX | RMFCX / WHGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.55 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.63 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.522 | 5.837 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 74.3M | 157,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.12 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | -7.17 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.10 | 2.65 | 1,325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.58 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LVOCX | 15.31 | N/A | N/A |
| Lord Abbett Value Opportunities C | |||
| SUPCX | 23.51 | N/A | N/A |
| DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class C | |||
| SLMCX | 249.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A | |||
| CDEYX | 20.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional 3 | |||
| CIOVX | 22.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Causeway International Opps Inv | |||