Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WLCVX
RMFCX vs WLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WLCVX
RMFCX vs WLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WLCVX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and WLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WLCVX (189M). RMFCX (1.15) and WLCVX (1.11) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than WLCVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs WLCVX (30 years). WLCVX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). WLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCVX: RMFCX (250) vs WLCVX (250000). WLCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.90 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. WLCVX (16.43).
| RMFCX | WLCVX | RMFCX / WLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.00 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.03 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.454 | 18.899 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 189M | 62,434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 15.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.82 | 42.50 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 16.43 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | 49.64 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers