Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWLAX
RMFCX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWLAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
Westwood Quality Value Fund A
Price$14.15
Change+$0.08 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.58M
RMFCX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWLAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. WWLAX (184M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMFCX (1.20) vs WWLAX (1.14). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WWLAX (18 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWLAX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. WWLAX (-5.18). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. WWLAX (19.94).
| RMFCX | WWLAX | RMFCX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.613 | 4.274 | 342% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 184M | 60,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | -5.18 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.44 | 23.66 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.04 | 19.94 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.77 | 35.17 | 252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement