Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWLAX
RMFCX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWLAX
RMFCX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WWLAX (76.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMFCX (1.16) vs WWLAX (0.92). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMFCX (24 years) vs WWLAX (19 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWLAX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. WWLAX (-7.52). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. WWLAX (-7.80).
| RMFCX | WWLAX | RMFCX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 8.390 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 76.2M | 154,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.92 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | -7.52 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 2.04 | 1,707% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -7.80 | -477% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.06 | 25.15 | 362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement