Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs ZDIVX
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs ZDIVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
Zacks Dividend Investor
Price$28.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.01M
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. ZDIVX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and ZDIVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. ZDIVX (129M). ZDIVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ZDIVX (1.37) vs RMFCX (1.21). RMFCX was incepted earlier than ZDIVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs ZDIVX (12 years). ZDIVX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ZDIVX (11.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIVX: RMFCX (250) vs ZDIVX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. ZDIVX (4.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. ZDIVX (48.73).
| RMFCX | ZDIVX | RMFCX / ZDIVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.30 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.783 | 11.554 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 129M | 85,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 4.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 20.24 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.67 | 48.73 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.73 | 99.62 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers