Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs ZDIVX
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs ZDIVX
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. ZDIVX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and ZDIVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ZDIVX (142M). ZDIVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ZDIVX (1.48) vs RMFCX (1.16). RMFCX was incepted earlier than ZDIVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs ZDIVX (12 years). ZDIVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ZDIVX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIVX: RMFCX (250) vs ZDIVX (2500). ZDIVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.41 vs. RMFCX (7.69). ZDIVX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| RMFCX | ZDIVX | RMFCX / ZDIVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.325 | 12.740 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 142M | 83,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.48 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 17.41 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 41.78 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 42.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | 114.10 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement