Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs ZDIVX
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs ZDIVX
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. ZDIVX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and ZDIVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ZDIVX (148M). ZDIVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ZDIVX (1.44) vs RMFCX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than ZDIVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs ZDIVX (13 years). ZDIVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ZDIVX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIVX: RMFCX (250) vs ZDIVX (2500). ZDIVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.98 vs. RMFCX (10.11). ZDIVX return over 5 years is better than : 42.31 vs. RMFCX (38.12).
| RMFCX | ZDIVX | RMFCX / ZDIVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.975 | 16.253 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 148M | 79,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.44 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 19.98 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.68 | 47.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.12 | 42.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.39 | 119.78 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers